EvidenceAlerts

Gardner DM, Turner JP, Magalhaes S, et al. Patient Self-Guided Interventions to Reduce Sedative Use and Improve Sleep: The YAWNS NB Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 18:e242731. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2731. (Original study)
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Direct-to-patient interventions enabling transitions from long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA) use to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI) by older adults has the potential to reduce BZRA use and related harms while improving sleep outcomes without requiring prearranged clinician involvement.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 direct-to-patient behavior change interventions with treatment as usual (TAU) on BZRA use, sleep, and other health outcomes, and uptake of CBTI techniques.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Your Answers When Needing Sleep in New Brunswick (YAWNS NB) study was a 3-arm, pragmatic, open-label, minimum-contact, randomized clinical trial. The study began November 2020 and ended June 2022. Participants were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups, including 2 different mailed behavior change interventions or no intervention (TAU). Participants were from communities across the province of New Brunswick, Canada, and included adults 65 years and older living independently with long-term use of BZRAs and current or past insomnia.

INTERVENTIONS: The Sleepwell package (YAWNS-1) consisted of a cover letter and 2 booklets ("How to Stop Sleeping Pills" and "How to Get Your Sleep Back"). The other package (YAWNS-2) included updated versions of the 2 booklets ("You May Be at Risk" and "How to Get a Good Night's Sleep Without Medication") used in the Eliminating Medications Through Patient Ownership of End Results (EMPOWER) study.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: BZRA use at 6 months was the primary measure. Secondary measures included CBTI use, sleep, insomnia, daytime sleepiness, safety, anxiety, frailty, and quality of life.

RESULTS: A total of 1295 individuals expressed interest in the study, and 565 (43.6%) completed a baseline assessment. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 72.1 (5.7) years, a mean (SD) BZRA use duration of 11.4 (9.1) years, and 362 (64.1%) were female. Discontinuations and dose reductions of 25% or greater were highest with YAWNS-1 (50 of 191 [26.2%]; 39 of 191 [20.4%]; total, 46.6%) compared with YAWNS-2 (38 of 187 [20.3%]; 27 of 187 [14.4%]; total, 34.8%, P = .02) and TAU (14 of 187 [7.5%]; 24 of 187 [12.8%]; total, 20.3%, P < .001). YAWNS-1 also demonstrated better uptake of CBTI techniques and sleep outcomes compared with YAWNS-2 (new CBTI techniques: 3.1 vs 2.4; P =.03; sleep efficiency change: 4.1% vs -1.7%; P =.001) and reduced insomnia severity and daytime sleepiness compared with TAU (insomnia severity index change: -2.0 vs 0.3; P <.001; Epworth Sleepiness Scale change: -0.8 vs 0.3; P =.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of the YAWNS NB randomized clinical trial show that, as a simple, scalable, direct-to-patient intervention, YAWNS-1 substantially reduced BZRA use and improved sleep outcomes. It could be implemented to transform insomnia care for older adults at the population level.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04406103.

Ratings
Discipline Area Score
Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP) 6 / 7
General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US) 6 / 7
Geriatrics 6 / 7
Comments from MORE raters

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US) rater

I think these kinds of interventions are going to be at the health system level rather than at the practice level, but this is still something worthwhile for primary care physicians to know. I will predict right now that if someone does widely implement this, they will find it less effective than in this trial that conducted with people who were recruited as interested. When sent out en masse to everyone, there's going to be some large number of dis-interested patients who simply disregard it. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be done because it still might have an effect.

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US) rater

This issue comes up frequently in primary care. The efficacy of this intervention is exciting, but how to implement it outside of a study setting?

General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US) rater

Great study of a direct-to-patient scalable intervention.

Geriatrics rater

If we could have access to these materials, it would be awesome!!
Comments from EvidenceAlerts subscribers

No subscriber has commented on this article yet.