EvidenceAlerts

Shokoohi H, Peksa GD, Hutchison A, et al. Ultrasound accuracy in acute diverticulitis: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 10;92:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.002. (Systematic review)
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The utility of ultrasound for diagnosing diverticulitis, especially in high-risk cases with complicated diverticulitis, remains debated. This study aimed to provide contemporary quantitative data synthesis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in patients with suspected diverticulitis.

METHODS: Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL were searched from January 1st,1990 to September 15th, 2023, for potentially relevant articles. Selected studies evaluated and reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis using CT as the gold standard. Subgroup analyses were conducted for simple versus complicated diverticulitis, and for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) versus radiology-performed ultrasound (RADUS). Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Diagnostic odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

RESULTS: A total of 12 diagnostic studies (n = 2056 patients) were identified. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 92.5 % (95 % CI 86.9 %-95.8 %) and specificity of 87.7 % (95 % CI 75.7 %-94.2 %) for detecting acute diverticulitis. The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 8.28 (95 % CI 4.74-14.45) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.08 (95 % CI 0.05-0.15). For complicated diverticulitis ultrasound had a sensitivity of 58.3 % (95 % CI 46.1 %-69.8 %) and specificity of 98.2 % (95 % CI 96.4-99.2). The LR+ was 31.86 (95 % CI 15.61-65.06) and LR- was -0.42 (95 % CI 0.32-0.56)). Subgroup analysis showed POCUS had 94.1 % (95 % CI 91.4 %-95.9 %) sensitivity and 89.8 % (95 % CI 77.6 %-95.7 %) specificity, while RADUS had 83.2 % (95 % CI 68.3 %-91.9 %) sensitivity and 88.7 % (95 % CI 76.1 %-95.1 %) specificity for detecting acute diverticulitis.

CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound had high accuracy for diagnosing acute diverticulitis with greater sensitivity when performed by emergency physicians and surgeons at the bedside. For complicated diverticulitis, the overall sensitivity was lower, while the specificity was higher.


Related DynaMed Topics

Ratings
Discipline Area Score
Emergency Medicine 6 / 7
Gastroenterology 6 / 7
Surgery - Gastrointestinal 5 / 7
Comments from MORE raters

Emergency Medicine rater

The 2015 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference explored the topic of "optimizing advanced imaging" (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15532712/2015/22/12) in an era where CT imaging rates continued to climb along with specific diagnoses like pulmonary embolism while cause-specific mortality plateaued. A myriad factors precipitated over-testing, over-diagnosis, and over-treatment in emergency medicine (http://pmid.us/26568269) and have been fueled by the AHRQ diagnostic errors report (http://pmid.us/37091932) prompting researchers to explore alternative diagnostic approaches for commonly encountered scenarios (e.g., ultrasound rather than CT for diverticulitis). This systematic review provides a quantitative basis across multiple settings and populations upon which to confidently build an ultrasound approach to diagnosing diverticulitis.

Emergency Medicine rater

Since the sensitivity of POCUS for complicated diverticulitis is low, POCUS cannot be used yet as the final determinant imaging study for diverticulitis. It's interesting that the sensitivity and specificity of US by EM and surgery US is higher than radiology's.

Gastroenterology rater

Useful assessment of increasingly available technology in a common clinical scenario.

Surgery - Gastrointestinal rater

The message is, the sensitivity and specificity of modern USS is high in accurately detecting acute diverticulitis. Also, it ought to be less expensive compared with a CT scan with its potential for exposing the patient to harmful radiation.
Comments from EvidenceAlerts subscribers

Dr. .............. .............. (3/27/2025 10:05 AM)

Translated by AI: In high-risk cases with complicated diverticulitis requiring hospital admission, raising a confirmatory diagnosis with POCUS (possible intra-abdominal abscesses or peritonitis) seems difficult. // En casos de alto riesgo con diverticulitis complicada que requiere ingreso en el hospital, plantear un diagnostico de confirmación con POCUS (posibles abscesos intraabdominales o peritonitis) parece difícil.